Pages

Benjamin Britten


“It is cruel, you know, that music should be so beautiful. It has the beauty of loneliness and of pain: of strength and freedom. The beauty of disappointment and never-satisfied love. The cruel beauty of nature, and everlasting beauty of monotony.”
~ Benjamin Britten



Britten's 'War Requiem'
by MARIN ALSOP
November 21, 2013 2:33 PM

I'm a bit of a cynic when it comes to composer anniversaries but this year, marking 100 years since the birth of Benjamin Britten, has been absolutely fascinating for me. I am now living proof that such centenaries can indeed change the way we look at a composer and provide us with opportunities to explore their breadth and depth. In Britten I have found a new hero, a musically surprising and multi-dimensional citizen of the world.

Discovering Britten through his monumental War Requiem has been both easy and complex — a perfect summation of the man himself — but always immensely inspiring.

As Leonard Bernstein said, "Ben Britten was a man at odds with the world. On the surface his music would seem to be decorative, positive, charming ... and it's so much more than that. When you hear Britten's music — if you really hear it — you become aware of something very dark ... there are gears that are grinding and not quite meshing and they make a great pain."

In the War Requiem, from 1962, Britten took the status quo and turned it on its head in the most polite way possible, setting the stage for Bernstein's own worldly commentary in his Mass 10 years later. I feel confident that without Britten's Requiem, Bernstein's work would not be the same.

The traditional Requiem Mass, so vividly captured by Mozart and Verdi and then pushed in a new direction by Brahms — whose intimate personal hand is evident throughout his German Requiem (which he toyed with calling "A Human Requiem") — becomes the vehicle for Britten's own personal beliefs and worldview.

An avowed conscientious objector, Britten left England during the Second World War, an action that he would later have to defend vigorously. His commitment to pacifism and humanity manifest itself through his War Requiem.

Einstein's Monster

What You Didn't Know About Einstein
BY IRA FLATOW
NOV. 13, 2013


I rarely single out a book for praise. But when you find yourself poring through a book's end notes and re-reading pages after finishing it like I did with this particular book, you want to let others know about it. It's called Einstein and The Quantum: The Quest of the Valian Swabian, by A. Douglas Stone.

I'm an Einstein fan from way back. And I love history. So when a book combines the two and sheds a whole bunch of new light on him and his work, then I'm hooked. I've always wondered why Einstein didn't win the Nobel Prize in Physics for his relativity work. I've always wondered why he created but later didn't accept quantum mechanics.

Stone answers these questions with new, revisionist insight about the world of science in the early 20th century and the characters and personalities that inhabited it. Quantum physics did not begin with Schrodinger's cat, like many of us think. It began with Einstein way before his work on relativity, and he would return again and again to problems in quantum theory, putting relativity aside for a while. 

All the great names are there. Max Born and Niels Bohr. Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg. But you'll also meet the not-so-famous, but still very important ones, like J.W. Gibbs. And S.N. Bose, who would help formulate the super cold Bose-Einstein "condensation" that would keep scientists busy even today.

If you're searching for a different take on physics, this one's for you. Stone doesn't just inject fresh ideas and perspective—he has the data to back them up: private letters, writings, and unpublished research unfamiliar to most of us.

There are no complex equations in this book. Just really good storytelling, which I'm hoping reads even better on my second pass. 


BY A. DOUGLAS STONE
OCT. 31, 2013

“Let’s see if Einstein can solve our problem.” This was not an idea I had ever entertained, much less verbalized, during my previous twenty-six years doing research in quantum physics. Physicists don’t read the works of the great masters of earlier generations. We learn physics from weighty textbooks in which the ideas are stated with cold-blooded logical inevitability, and the history that is mentioned is sanitized to eliminate the passions, egos, and human frailties of the great “natural philosophers.” After all, since physical science (we believe) is a cumulative discipline, why shouldn’t we downplay or even censor the missteps and misunderstandings of our predecessors? It is daunting enough to attempt to master and then extend the most complex concepts produced by the human mind, such as the bizarre description of the atomic world provided by quantum theory. Wouldn’t telling the real human history of discovery just confuse people?

Thus, while I had studied history and philosophy of science avidly as an undergraduate, I had not read a single word written by Einstein during my actual career as a research physicist. I was of course aware that Einstein had contributed to the subject of quantum physics. Even freshman physics students learn that Einstein explained the photoelectric effect and said something fundamental about the quantized nature of light. And both atomic and solid-state physics (my specialty) have specific equations of quantum theory named for Einstein. So clearly the guy did something important in the subject. But the most familiar fact about Einstein and quantum mechanics is that he just didn’t like it. He refused to use the theory in its final form. And troubled by the fundamental indeterminism of quantum mechanics, he famously dismissed its worldview with the phrase “God does not play dice.”

Despite its esoteric-sounding name, quantum mechanics represents arguably the greatest achievement of human understanding of nature. By the end of the nineteenth century progress in physical science was stymied by the most basic problem: what are the fundamental constituents of matter, and how do they work? The existence of atoms was fairly well established, but they were clearly much too small to be observed in any direct manner. Hints were emerging from indirect probes that the microscopic world did not obey the settled laws of macroscopic Newtonian physics; but would scientists ever be able to understand and predict the properties of objects and forces so far from our everyday experience? For decades the answer was in doubt, until a theory emerged, a theory that has now withstood almost a century of tests and extensions. That theory has wrung human knowledge from the deep interior of the atomic nucleus and from the vacuum of intergalactic space. It is the theory that most physicists use every day in their work. This is the theory that Einstein rejected. Thus most physicists think of Einstein as playing a significant but still secondary role in this intellectual triumph.

I might have continued with this conventional view of Einstein and quantum physics for my entire career, if not for a coincidental intersection of my own research with that of the great man. I am interested in quantum systems, which if they were not microscopic but were scaled up in size to everyday proportions, would behave “chaotically.” In physics this is a technical term; it means that very small differences in the initial state of a system lead to large differences in the final state, similar to the way a pencil, momentarily balanced on its point, will fall to the left or right when nudged by the smallest puff of air. I was searching (with one of my PhD students) for a good explanation of the difficulty that arises when mixing this sort of unstable situation with quantum theory. I recalled hearing that Einstein had written something related to this in 1917 and, almost as a lark, I suggested that we see if this work were relevant to our task.

Well the joke was on us. When we finally got our hands on the paper, we quickly realized that Einstein had put his finger on the essence of the problem and had delineated when it has a solution, before the invention of the modern quantum theory. Moreover, Einstein wrote with great lucidity about the subject, so that it seemed as if he were speaking directly to us, a century later. There was nothing dated or quaint about the analysis. For the first time in a long while, I found myself thinking, “Wow, this man really was a genius.”

This experience piqued my interest in the actual history of Einstein and quantum theory, and as I delved into the subject I came to a stunning realization. It was Einstein who had introduced almost all the revolutionary ideas underlying quantum theory, and who saw first what these ideas meant. His ultimate rejection of quantum theory was akin to Dr. Frankenstein’s shunning of the monster he had originally created for the betterment of mankind. Had Einstein not done so, in all likelihood he would be seen as the father of the modern theory.

Excerpted from Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian, by A. Douglas Stone. (c) 2014 by Princeton University Press. Reprinted by permission."

About the Author
A. Douglas Stone is Carl Morse Professor of Applied Physics and Physics at Yale University. He is a theoretical physicist who has done award-winning research on the quantum properties of nanoscale electronic devices and on the fundamental theory of microlasers, including the invention of the "anti-laser." In addition to a Ph.D. in Physics from MIT, he holds degrees in social studies from Harvard and in physics and philosophy from Oxford.

The Leidenfrost Effect



In the Leidenfrost Effect, a water droplet will float on a layer of its own vapor if heated to a certain temperature. This common cooking phenomenon takes center stage in a series of playful experiments by physicists at England's University of Bath, who discovered new and fun means to manipulate the movement of water.

Produced by Luke Groskin. Music by Audio Network, Sounddogs
Photos and Videos by Carmen Cheng, Matthew Guy, Kei Takashina, Alessandro Narduzzo, Chloe Myers, Laura Leitch, Andrew Rhead, Alex Grounds, Richard Still, Paul Reddish, and Simon Wharf. 

Northern Lights

When photographer Mike Taylor captured this image, he saw "dancing lights" in the sky that waved a bit like curtains. 
Credit: Image copyright Mike Taylor http://miketaylorphoto.com/

For this aurora, photographer Mike Taylor didn't see much of the beauty until he viewed the long-exposure-time images on his computer.
Credit: Image copyright Mike Taylor http://miketaylorphoto.com/

The most impressive oval aurora photographer Mike Taylor had ever seen, it formed a perfect arc that covered the northern sky's horizon. 
Credit: Image copyright Mike Taylor http://miketaylorphoto.com/

Expatriate Life

Charlie Chaplin

The Dark Side of the Expat Life
By MARCUS MABRY and JAN BENZEL


Albert Einstein

If you are a member of Rendezvous’s global tribe, “home” might be where your apartment, your work or your belongings — or even your family and friends — are. But it might also be a place where language and culture are confounding. And deep down, despite the thrills and invigorating challenges of an experience abroad, more often than not, we know it’s not a place we’ll stay forever.

This dislocation — psychic as well as geographic — comes with inevitable lonelinesses, small and large. There are holidays with family missed, and life events — weddings, birthday parties, memorial services, births — that happen without you.

When we asked recently who studies abroad, who stays put and why, one comment struck many Rendezvous readers as particularly pointed, and poignant:

Alex Ellsworth, a former New Yorker living in Seoul, South Korea, wrote:
Studying and living abroad has been a fantastic journey spanning 12 years and three continents.
But … expat life has a dark side: getting stuck in limbo, neither here nor there. I’ve watched as peers back home have married, had children, bought houses, advanced in their careers.
Meanwhile, most of us here in Seoul find ourselves living Peter Pan-like existences. I’m entering middle age with nothing tangible to show for it.
Except wonderful, rich memories, sure. But the future looms.
So should I go home pre-emptively and try to build a life there? But therein lies the expat’s problem: there’s nothing back home for me now. Home is not “back home”; home is Seoul. My life is here.
Colleen, in London, responded:
Thanks for your thoughts, Alex. I very much share your sentiments about being abroad long term. Today especially I’ve been struggling coming to terms with being away from home for so long. I wanted to move to England for most of my 20s after studying abroad in London for my last semester of undergrad. I completed my MSc here in the U.K. and really been able to do all that I set out to do. It hasn’t been easy, but it’s been worth it. I would never have the kind of self-reliance and strength of character that I do today if I would have stayed Stateside. That’s the really lovely bit of being abroad.
I have been living in England for three years now. I haven’t seen my family in two years and it weighs heavily upon my heart. E-mail and Skype can only do so much for you. I do worry whether I should return and put down roots permanently for once in my life.
I am about to start a new permanent job, but I worry a lot about finances, visas, finding love and starting a family. I wonder if it would be easier to get on with life if I were in the States. How do you know when to pack it in and head back? 
I think this kind of thought and uncertainty is good. And it’s nice to have a place to express the thoughts and feelings with other expats.
And Kayan, in Algiers, wrote:
I totally agree with you Alex.
However, we can transform ourselves into “ants.” If you really feel attached to your adopted country, maybe it’s better to think about how to settle down permanently by finding a long-term work contract or establishing a family.
My best Asian friend did that in Paris and he’s just so happy about his family and job.
But it also depends on luck. We’d found love almost at the same time, then I broke up with my partner five years later and became “rootless” again.
Now drifted to Africa in my middle 30s, I have exactly the same ominous feelings about my future as Alex wrote.
The Hague, where our contributor Chris Schuetze lives, has several global courts and international headquarters — and, therefore, a large and multinational expat population. Many of them do not learn Dutch both because of the complexity of the language and the fact that virtually everyone speaks English.

Separate American, French, German, Polish, European (with English, Spanish and Dutch streams), international and Indonesian schools mean that not even children — who have a much easier time picking up language — have to learn Dutch beyond a few playground pleasantries. In such situations it’s no surprise that home abroad never becomes simply “home.”


Project Xpat: Exploring The Expatriate Life
by LINTON WEEKS
November 22, 201311:11 AM

Ernest Hemingway

Funny thing about being an American living away from America: It makes you think more about what it means to be an American.

But which is the dominant sentiment? Absence makes the heart grow fonder? Or out of sight, out of mind? The answer depends on a lot of variables.

Over the years, various people and projects have explored those variables: the mechanics and meanings of expatriation.

One of America's most notable expatriates, novelist Ernest Hemingway, examined the notion from many angles in the 1920s.

On one hand, Hemingway glamorized the expatriate life. "If you are lucky enough to have lived in Paris as a young man," he wrote in a memoir, "then wherever you go for the rest of your life, it stays with you, for Paris is a moveable feast."

On the other hand, he mocked Americans living in Europe. "You're an expatriate," Bill Gorton tells Jake Barnes in Hemingway's 1926 novel The Sun Also Rises. "You've lost touch with the soil. You get precious. Fake European standards have ruined you. You drink yourself to death. You become obsessed with sex. You spend all your time talking, not working. You are an expatriate, see? You hang around cafes."

A Privileged Lot

Now, nearly a century later, Americans still wrestle with the pros and cons of international living. For a while, the International Herald Tribune website produced a lively blog, Rendezvous, with stories about today's expatriates.

"Our world faces daunting challenges," the Rendezvous editors wrote in the inaugural post in January 2012. "Those of us who travel, live, work, connect and reason across national borders are a privileged lot; we see many of those challenges up close. And this fortunate minority of globetrotters is growing. We know more about the world — and one another — than ever before."

When the IHT was rechristened as the International New York Times, the diary ended, in June 2013.

Other groups, including Transitions Abroad and Expatnetwork, continue to connect with — and provide news and services to — the global community of American expatriates.

Making The Decision

On her website, Clary Estes, a 25-year-old American living in Japan, poses a question: Why are we ExPats? She is hoping to develop "a crowd-sourced journalism project where people can come together and talk about this question, while ultimately creating a forum to talk about globalization and personal identity outside of one's home."

She says, "It struck me early in my move to Japan that living in a totally different place is not easy and frequently requires people to learn another language, be far away from their families for long periods of time, adapt to new customs and laws, and a whole myriad different issues. It is as stressful, complicated, frustrating as it is exciting. So why do people do it?"

What It Means

It's an intriguing question.

We at Project Xpat have another.

Ours is a 10-word question: What Does It Mean To You To Be An Expatriate?

We want to hear from Americans living in other countries. And from Americans who know others living abroad.

And we are looking for a 10-words (or less) answer. With good, crisp photos of the American expatriates. If you'd like to participate, please use this form. (Sorry about the form-ality, but it's the easiest way for us to collect your answers.)

The Protojournalist is an experiment in reporting. Abstract. Concrete. @NPRtpj

Space Dust

Your house is full of space dust – it reveals the solar system’s story
2 November 2013, 6.13am GMT
by Natalie Starkey
Research Associate at The Open University


When you clean your house you are probably vacuuming up space dust. Not kidding. It is the same dust that was once part of comets and asteroids. You see that dust in the faint glow it helps create before sunrise and after sunset. As much as 40,000 tons of space dust arrives on Earth every year.

While that fact may not be in doubt, there is a lot of debate about where this dust comes from. Most of it, we know, spirals down from the interplanetary dust cloud, a vast swathe of dust extending in a disk-shape around the sun. But where exactly did this dust cloud originate?

Recent studies suggest that less than 10% of the dust comes from asteroids, but that a much larger portion originates from Jupiter-family comets. These comets, which are made up of ice and dust, orbit around the sun close to Jupiter. They most likely enter the inner solar system because of collisions with other comets in the Kuiper belt, a major comet belt found beyond Neptune.

When space dust falls to Earth, depending on its size and abundance, it can produce a meteor shower (shooting stars). In fact, the annual Perseids and Leonids meteor showers are produced by the Earth encountering the dusty debris left behind from comets Swift-Tuttle and Tempel-Tuttle. Comet dust travels at high speeds, sometimes more than 150,000kph. It is slowed by the Earth’s atmosphere, but the pressure created on bigger pieces is enough to cause it to burn up in a flash of light. Smaller particles are the lucky ones. They can deal with the sudden change in pressure when entering Earth’s atmosphere and make it all the way to the surface.

NASA regularly uses special ER2 aircraft, a research version of the U2 spy plane, to fly at stratospheric heights (around 20km, twice that of a commercial plane) to collect space dust. The collection technique itself is simple. When at cruising altitude in the stratosphere the pilot opens up some pods below the wing containing “sticky pads”, which collect pieces of space dust. Back on Earth NASA use an exceptionally clean laboratory to pick the space dust from the collectors for researchers, like myself, to study.

My research is based around these dust particles because they offer our best opportunity to sample comets. The ER2 is a much cheaper way of obtaining these samples. The other method involves launching a spacecraft to reach out to a comet, and ensuring it can come back after passing through a comet’s icy and dusty tail, or even landing on its surface. There has been only one comet sample return mission to date – NASA’s Stardust.

Such missions, despite their expense, provide the most pristine solar system samples we will ever get. The spacecraft acts like a cocoon, protecting the samples on their travel through space, and from the extreme heating effects of entering the Earth’s atmosphere that can otherwise cause irreversible changes to the sample.

Comets contain the initial dust that formed our solar system, and, because they stayed far away from the sun for most of their lives, they act as a deep freeze, preserving dust that is billions of years old. By studying this dust we can effectively travel back in time to the start of the solar system to understand the composition of everything we know, including early-formed organic matter and water.

Organic matter – chemical compounds containing carbon-hydrogen bonds – is actually ubiquitous throughout the universe. One of the big questions is whether organic compounds can be delivered to planets to form the basis for life. We are still not sure how life started on Earth. If this did happen, comets and asteroids are good candidates as a transport vehicle.

The same story applies to water. We clearly have a lot of it on Earth but understanding if it came from asteroid or comet collisions with Earth, or if it was present in Earth from the start, is a question we can try to answer with comet samples.

In a recent study, I measured different forms of the elements hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen in the cometary dust samples collected by NASA. The relationships between these different elements reveal information about where the comet formed in relation to the sun. They also tell us what kind of life the comet has had. For instance, if it was ever subjected to high temperatures, that would tell us if it had travelled near to the sun.

These dust samples add a few pieces to our complicated jigsaw of the solar system, helping us to understand when and where the planets formed, and how water and organic matter fit into the picture. We will never complete the jigsaw in my lifetime but continued analysis of samples returned from the depths of the solar system will help us make progress to figuring out where we came from.

Teaching Empathy


Video Game Creators Are Using Apps To Teach Empathy
by STEVE HENN
November 20, 2013 4:34 PM

Much of the modern education reform movement has centered around the drive for data. Standardized tests now gauge whether children are at grade level seemingly every few months. Kids are observed, measured and sorted almost constantly.

In Silicon Valley, a $20 billion industry does much the same thing — but for a different purpose.

Video game design has become a data-driven industry where games evolve depending on how they are played.

Now, some game designers are hoping to take these new skills and apply them back to education. But not in a classroom — they want to teach with a game on an iPad.

From Football To Feelings

More than 30 years ago, Trip Hawkins left Apple and founded Electronic Arts, the company behind EA Sports. The man who helped make Madden NFL a cultural icon now has a new vision for games: He wants to teach.

For sports video games, Hawkins brought game designers together with experts in the field — athletes and statisticians. Now he's bringing counselors into the mix. He wants to give those counselors data about what kids are actually doing in the games they play.

Analyzing data on how people play has become a huge part of the gaming industry.

"It's incredibly important," Hawkins says. "In the past you couldn't do it at all because the customer was playing a game in the basement on a machine that's not hooked up to the Internet. Once you bring the Internet into the equation, it's much easier to figure out what your problem is and how to improve the product."

So now, he says, they can apply that to other new markets, like education and social development.

Hawkins thinks a well-designed video game can teach kids empathy — how to listen to each other and control negative emotions. It could teach children basic skills that would ultimately help them get along better with each other and adults out in the real world.

Working Through Failure

Hawkins has gathered experts in social development and learning, and they're creating a new game called If. In the game, players visit an imaginary village called Greenberry.

"Greenberry is a world in which there are cats and there are dogs, and they don't get along well," says Jessica Berlinski, who helped design and write the game's story. "So part of the challenge is to figure out why, and then working to heal that."

As kids progress through the game, they begin to rebuild the village of Greenberry. And kind of like in Pokemon, they collect magical creatures who enhance their power.

Sometimes the creatures might die — but the game does something totally different: It helps them work through it. There's a virtual counseling session with a community leader, who teaches kids deep breathing exercises and has a dialogue about feelings of loss.

Berlinski, a founder of the educational tech company If You Can, says one goal of the game is to get kids to navigate interpersonal challenges and failures.

"The messaging that kids get in real life and certainly in schools is not that failure is OK — but in game environments, 80 percent of the time, gamers are failing, yet they are completely motivated to keep going," she says. "So something is going on there that is very positive. And we need to capitalize on that."

Will It Work?

But Catherine Steiner-Adair, a clinical psychologist at Harvard and author of The Big Disconnect: Protecting Childhood and Family Relationships in the Digital Age, is concerned that kids and their parents already spend too much time on devices.

"Nothing — no new app, no new game — can replace the old truth, I think, that children thrive, that families thrive, in the context of healthy real-life relationships," she says.

Still, Steiner-Adair says, a game that helps kids practice skills like listening and working through difficult emotions might be useful if it's played in moderation. "I am cautious, but I am guardedly optimistic that there could be some kind of computer game that could strengthen children's social and emotional intelligence," she says.

In the end, even Hawkins is the first to admit that kids won't actually play this game or learn anything unless the game is fun.

And building a kind of virtual counseling session into a fun video game is a tough trick.

IceCube Experiment

Dan Mccoy /Corbis

Scientists Find First Neutrinos from Distant Space
By Michael Moyer | November 21, 2013


The world has heard the first faint whispers of the most powerful cataclysms in the universe. Scientists working on the IceCube experiment in Antarctica report that they have found 28 neutrinos that must have come to earth from explosions in the distant universe—the first time scientists have found neutrinos coming from outside our own solar system. We wrote about the detections in the November issue of Scientific American, but the researchers have just now published their results in the journal Science. The results open up a new era of astronomy, allowing researchers to study not just the light from distant objects, but the fundamental particles that they generate as well.

The IceCube detector is itself a marvel of engineering. It consists of a three-dimensional grid of over 5,000 sensitive photodetectors suspended in the glacial ice beneath the South Pole. As a neutrino speeds through the grid, it occasionally bumps directly into an atom, setting off a tiny flash of light. The photodetectors pick up this tiny flash, and the data can be used to reconstruct the energy and direction of the neutrino that started it all. Here’s a short clip showing how light from one of the highest-energy neutrinos, nicknamed “Ernie,” passed through the detector:


The researchers next want to try to identify a specific spot on the sky where these high-energy neutrinos are coming from. If they could observe a high-energy event with both ordinary telescopes and neutrino eyes, they could gain a much richer understanding of the mysterious dynamics at the cores of the universe’s most extraordinary events.



[First video courtesy of the IceCube Collaboration]
[Second video courtesy of University Communications/University of Wisconsin–Madison]

About the Author: Michael Moyer is the editor in charge of space and physics coverage at Scientific American. Follow on Twitter @mmoyr

Victor Young Perez



Victor Young Perez

French-Arab boxer hits big screen in Holocaust drama
By Jon FROSCH  / Stéphanie TROUILLARD 
www.france24.com

Brahim Asloum

Until now, Brahim Asloum has been known as a French light flyweight boxer of Algerian descent, who rose to the top of his sport by taking home Olympic gold in 2000 and winning the world championship in 2007.

But in a new French film (hitting theatres here on Wednesday, November 20), Asloum takes on a daunting new role: that of big-screen lead.

It’s not just any old part. In Jacques Ouaniche’s “Victor Young Perez”, Asloum plays the Tunisian Jewish boxer of the title, who became world flyweight champion in 1931 and 1932 before being arrested in Paris and deported to Auschwitz in 1943. At the camp, he was forced to box in matches intended as entertainment for Nazis. Perez died during the “death march” from Auschwitz in 1945.


FRANCE 24 spoke with Asloum about the role, how he related to the man he played and what the film’s relevance may be in today’s Europe.

F24: How much did you know about Victor Perez before playing him?

BA: His story is not well known, unfortunately. I think France was ashamed of what happened [collaboration and the deportation of French Jews during World War II]. That history was officially recognised only in 1996, with [then-President] Jacques Chirac’s speech about Vichy. The boxing world knows him because of all his prizes, because he was world champion. In the 1930s, boxers were super stars like football champions today – like Ronaldo or Messi. But when he was sent to the camps, he was forgotten.

I personally learned about Victor’s story when I was starting training as a boxer [around 1996]. There was a plaque commemorating him at the National Institute of Sport and Physical Education. I walked by it every day, and I was intrigued by this champion from the same weight class [flyweight] as me. Twelve years later, I got a call to play the role.

F24: How did you relate to him and his very tumultuous life story?

BA: What Victor and I have in common is our journeys as boxers. We both rose to the top very quickly. He became world champion very young, and I was an Olympic champion by 21 years old. We were both popular figures in Paris, known throughout the world and the focus of media attention. So there are similarities. But he was a victim of history. And I haven’t been.

F24: What struck you most about the man as you learned about him?

BA: I learned a lot about Victor from a concentration camp survivor named Noah Klinger, who knew him in the camps. He explained how heroic he was, the risks he took. He was lucky – if we can even use that word – in that the head of the camp recognised him as a famous boxer, so let him work in the kitchen. Victor regularly stole soup to give to other camp inmates. When he was caught, he was beaten up, but that didn’t stop him from doing it again. When you’re in a situation where your survival instinct kicks in, it’s hard to know how you’re going to react. But he tried to bring humanity to a place that was devoid of it.

F24: A lot of films have been made about the Holocaust. Do you think this one has any particular resonance today?

BA: We, the new generation, we must not repeat the errors of our elders. I feel that this film comes at the right time, when I see the rise of [far-right] extremists in Europe today. One mustn’t forget that evil still exists and need only be awakened. We have to remain aware of that. Today, it’s Muslims [in Europe] who are persecuted. That’s the reality. We have to remain vigilant. It’s our duty of remembrance. Back then it was Victor Perez; today it could be Brahim Asloum.

F24: This is your first time acting, and it’s a lead role. How much of a challenge was it for you?

BA: There were certain things that I didn’t have to really work on, that were innate. How a champion acts and carries himself, that kind of thing was pretty easy. The hardest parts for me were the boxing scenes, because in the early scenes I had to play a novice and take all these punches. I actually had to allow myself to be punched. Beyond that, I had to do the work of an actor: to be open and willing to listen, to work with [director] Jacques [Ouaniche] and the crew, to rise to the occasion.

F24: What’s next for you?

BA: We’ll see. For now, I’m trying to get “Victor” off the ground in the best possible way. I want as many people as possible to know this story. I’ll have time to concentrate on other things after. I’ll probably take a bit of a holiday.